How to Read Smart Contract Code Before You Invest: A Practical Due-Diligence Playbook for Token and DeFi Risk

How to read smart contract code before you invest is not about becoming a full-time auditor overnight. It is about learning how to catch the contract risks that can destroy a position before price action even matters. The code defines who can mint, pause, upgrade, blacklist, tax, withdraw, route, rescue, or change the rules after users buy. This TokenToolHub field guide gives investors, researchers, builders, and advanced beginners a structured way to inspect Solidity contracts, proxies, roles, token controls, vault logic, oracle assumptions, external calls, and dangerous red-flag patterns before committing capital.

TL;DR

  • Smart contract review for investors is not full auditing. It is a structured risk sweep focused on dangerous permissions, upgrade paths, token traps, and failure modes.
  • Start by verifying the exact deployed contract. If source code is not verified on an explorer or through Sourcify, treat the contract as high risk.
  • Use a five-layer workflow: identify and verify, map architecture, inspect roles and permissions, review token logic, then check external calls and failure modes.
  • Upgradeable proxies are not automatically bad, but they add governance and admin risk. Always check proxy admin, implementation code, upgrade events, timelocks, and multisig control.
  • Search early for onlyOwner, mint, blacklist, whitelist, pause, setTax, upgradeTo, delegatecall, _transfer, and oracle reads.
  • Red flags include unrestricted minting, mutable 100% taxes, blacklist gates, owner-controlled sell restrictions, unguarded delegatecall, stale oracle reads, and EOA upgrade admins.
  • Use TokenToolHub Token Safety Checker as a first-pass scan for token controls, but still verify serious risks manually on-chain.
  • If the code, proxy admin, role ownership, liquidity controls, or audit scope cannot be verified, reduce size or walk away.
Investor mindset You are reading for risk, not elegance

A professional auditor may review every invariant, edge case, test suite, dependency, and economic assumption. An investor’s first task is narrower: identify whether the contract gives someone dangerous control over your ability to buy, sell, withdraw, redeem, or trust the token supply. If one address can change the rules, the investment is not purely market risk. It is permission risk.

This guide is educational and not financial, legal, tax, investment, custody, or audit advice. Always verify source code, deployed addresses, proxy admins, role holders, audit scopes, and transaction behavior independently before investing.

1. Mindset: what reading smart contract code really means

Reading smart contract code before investing does not mean you must instantly understand every line of Solidity. It means you follow a repeatable process that helps you detect common traps. Most avoidable token losses do not require sophisticated formal verification to catch. Many begin with visible owner powers, upgrade controls, hidden minting, blacklist functions, suspicious transfer logic, unlocked liquidity, fragile oracles, or contracts that are not verified at all.

The real discipline is knowing where to look first. Investors should not start by reading every library from top to bottom. Start with the control surface. Who owns the contract? Is it upgradeable? Can supply change? Can transfers be blocked? Can sell tax be raised? Can withdrawals be paused? Can the oracle be changed? Can a single EOA execute high-impact actions?

Your goal is to find the deal-breakers early. If the contract fails basic verification, if the owner can mint unlimited tokens, if proxy upgrades are controlled by one wallet, or if sellability depends on a whitelist, you do not need to spend three more hours researching the roadmap.

Five-Layer Contract Review Workflow Start with verification, then follow the control surface until risk becomes clear. 1. Verify Source and bytecode 2. Map Proxy and modules 3. Roles Owner and admins 4. Token Mint, tax, transfer 5. Fails Oracles and calls Rule: stop at the first critical failure. You do not need to force conviction. The safest loss is the trade you skipped because the code said no.

2. The five-layer workflow for code due diligence

Use this workflow every time you review a token, vault, staking contract, lending market, bridge wrapper, or DeFi protocol. It works because it moves from identity to architecture, then control, then economics, then failure behavior.

Five-layer investor workflow: Layer 1: Identify and verify - Correct address - Verified source code - Bytecode match - Constructor or initializer params Layer 2: Architecture - Proxy or immutable - Modules and external dependencies - Vaults, routers, oracles, bridges Layer 3: Roles and permissions - Owner - Admin - Multisig or EOA - Timelock - Minter, pauser, upgrader Layer 4: Token logic and economics - Mint, burn, taxes - Transfer hooks - Allowances and permits - Blacklists and max wallet rules Layer 5: External calls and failure modes - Reentrancy - Oracle manipulation - Slippage handling - Delegatecall - Withdrawal and redemption failure
Time-box rule Spend 20 to 30 minutes on layers 1 to 3 first

If the contract is not verified, the proxy admin is a single EOA, or owner roles are too broad, you already have enough reason to reduce exposure or walk away. Deep dives are useful only after the basic control surface is acceptable.

3. Layer 1: identify and verify the deployed contract

Before reading code, confirm you are reading the right code. This sounds basic, but many users lose money because they inspect the wrong token, a copied contract, an unofficial pair, or a fake address shared in a reply thread.

Find the correct address

Get the address from the project’s official website, official docs, or pinned social account. Then cross-check it on a trusted explorer. For EVM chains, use block explorers such as Etherscan, Basescan, BscScan, or Polygonscan.

The token symbol is not enough. Token tickers are not unique. Contract address is the identity.

Check source verification

On an EVM explorer, open the Contract tab. If it says source code is verified, you can inspect the Solidity files, ABI, compiler version, and constructor arguments. If it is not verified, you are mostly blind. That does not prove malicious behavior, but it makes the risk far higher.

For stronger source-to-bytecode assurance, check whether the contract has a match on Sourcify. A full match gives better confidence that the source code corresponds to the deployed bytecode.

Read constructor or initializer parameters

Constructor parameters often define the original owner, treasury, router, token name, initial supply, fee wallets, pair address, and admin values. For upgradeable contracts, the initializer performs a similar role. If the initializer gave dangerous power to an EOA, that matters even if the project later claims decentralization.

Layer 1 checklist

  • Contract address came from official project sources.
  • Explorer shows verified source code.
  • Compiler version and optimization settings are visible.
  • Constructor or initializer parameters are readable.
  • Contract is checked against Sourcify where available.
  • Token address matches the liquidity pool and DEX analytics page.
  • Audit scope, if any, matches the deployed contract version.

4. Layer 2: map the architecture, proxy, modules, vaults, routers, and oracles

Smart contracts rarely live alone. A token may connect to a router, pair, fee manager, staking vault, strategy, bridge, oracle, or proxy admin. A protocol may use multiple contracts with separate roles. Architecture tells you where the real control and risk sit.

Upgradeable proxies

A proxy is a contract that stores state and delegates logic to an implementation contract. Upgradeability allows the implementation to change. This can help teams patch bugs, but it also means the rules can change after users buy or deposit.

Common proxy patterns include Transparent proxies, UUPS proxies, Beacon proxies, and more modular structures. The specific pattern matters less than the control question: who can upgrade the implementation, how fast can they do it, and can users see the change before it executes?

Proxy review flow: 1. Open explorer page. 2. Check if the contract is marked as a proxy. 3. Open "Read as Proxy" where available. 4. Find implementation address. 5. Verify implementation source code. 6. Find proxy admin or upgrader role. 7. Check whether admin is EOA, multisig, DAO, or timelock. 8. Review upgrade events and implementation history.

Modules and attached contracts

Many token and DeFi systems separate responsibilities across contracts. A token may route fees to a fee manager. A vault may call a strategy. A strategy may depend on an oracle. A router may execute swaps through external pools. A bridge wrapper may depend on a cross-chain messaging system.

Each module adds attack surface. The more modules a protocol has, the more important it is to understand what each one can do.

Vaults and oracles

Vaults require special attention because users deposit assets and receive shares. The share price depends on conversion math and totalAssets. Oracles require special attention because they determine asset value, collateral health, liquidation, and redemption pricing.

  • For vaults, inspect deposit, withdraw, redeem, convertToShares, convertToAssets, and totalAssets.
  • For oracles, inspect price source, decimals, staleness checks, heartbeat assumptions, fallback behavior, and whether a single DEX spot price is trusted.
  • For routers, inspect whether slippage is user-supplied or hard-coded.
  • For bridges, inspect external trust assumptions and pause controls.
Architecture piece What to inspect Main risk
Proxy Implementation, proxy admin, upgrade role, timelock. Rules can change after users enter.
Router Configurable router address, minOut, pair recognition. Bad routing, slippage abuse, fee-on-transfer issues.
Vault Share math, totalAssets, withdrawal gates, pause controls. Mispriced shares, blocked exits, accounting bugs.
Oracle Source, staleness, decimals, TWAP, fallback. Bad pricing, liquidations, manipulation.
Bridge Message verification, admin powers, pause, rescue logic. Cross-chain dependency and custody risk.

5. Layer 3: inspect roles, ownership, permissions, multisigs, and timelocks

Roles are where trust assumptions become visible. A contract may look decentralized on the website while one wallet still controls minting, pausing, taxes, upgrades, fees, or treasury movement.

Ownable and onlyOwner

Many contracts use OpenZeppelin-style Ownable. That means certain functions can only be called by the owner. Your job is to search for onlyOwner and ask what those functions can change.

Search these ownership keywords: onlyOwner owner() transferOwnership renounceOwnership setTax setFee setRouter setPair setBlacklist setWhitelist setTrading pause unpause mint burn rescue withdraw upgradeTo

AccessControl roles

Some contracts use role-based permissions. This can be better than one owner if roles are scoped properly. But it can also hide risk if DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE or UPGRADER_ROLE is controlled by a single EOA.

  • DEFAULT_ADMIN_ROLE: can usually grant and revoke other roles.
  • MINTER_ROLE: can create new tokens if enabled.
  • PAUSER_ROLE: can pause transfers, deposits, withdrawals, or protocol actions.
  • UPGRADER_ROLE: can change implementation logic in upgradeable contracts.
  • ORACLE_ROLE: may update pricing or feed configuration.

Multisigs and timelocks

A multisig such as Safe requires multiple signers to approve a transaction. A timelock delays execution so users can review upcoming changes. Together, they reduce single-key risk and give the market time to react.

A serious protocol should use multisig plus timelock for high-impact actions such as upgrades, treasury withdrawals, fee changes, pausing withdrawals, oracle changes, and role grants.

Role and permission red flags

  • Single EOA controls ownership.
  • Single EOA controls proxy upgrades.
  • Owner can mint unlimited tokens.
  • Owner can blacklist users.
  • Owner can change sell tax to extreme values.
  • Owner can pause withdrawals indefinitely.
  • Admin can rescue user funds through broad rescue functions.
  • No timelock for high-impact changes.
  • Roles are undocumented or do not match the project’s claims.

Scan token control risks before you buy

Use TokenToolHub’s Token Safety Checker to review common token risks such as owner powers, blacklist logic, mint authority, pause controls, proxy upgradeability, hidden taxes, and sell restrictions before interacting with unknown tokens.

6. Layer 4: review token logic, economics, mints, burns, taxes, and allowances

Token logic is where many scams hide. The most important function is often _transfer. That is where fees, sell restrictions, trading toggles, max wallet rules, blacklist checks, pair checks, and external calls can appear.

ERC-20 anatomy for investors

ERC-20 review map: transfer() calls _transfer() transferFrom() checks allowance calls _transfer() _transfer() check for: - fee logic - blacklist logic - whitelist gates - tradingEnabled - maxTx - maxWallet - pair detection - external calls - sell-only conditions _mint() check who can increase supply _burn() check whether burn is real or cosmetic

Mint risk

Mint authority means token supply can increase. That may be legitimate for some protocols, but it must be bounded, documented, and controlled. If an owner can mint unlimited supply after launch, tokenomics are not fixed.

  • Search for _mint, mint, increaseSupply, reward, and airdrop.
  • Check if minting is capped by max supply.
  • Check who can call mint functions.
  • Check recent mint events after launch.
  • Check whether mint role can be granted later.

Taxes and fee logic

Token taxes are not always scams, but mutable taxes are dangerous. A current 3% tax is less important than the maximum tax the owner can set. If the owner can raise sell tax to 99% or 100%, the token can become a honeypot without changing its name, logo, or chart page.

  • Search for tax setters such as setTax, setBuyTax, setSellTax, setFees, and updateFees.
  • Check maximum allowed tax.
  • Check whether some wallets are excluded from taxes.
  • Check where fees go.
  • Check whether pair addresses can be changed by owner.

Allowances, Permit, and Permit2

Allowances define who can spend tokens from a wallet. Normal DeFi uses approvals, but broad approvals create long-term risk. Permit systems allow off-chain signatures to create approvals. This can improve UX, but users must still read the spender, amount, deadline, nonce, and verifying contract.

When reviewing a token or app, check how approvals are requested and whether users are pushed toward unlimited approvals. If the protocol integrates Permit2 or external allowance managers, users must understand that shared approval systems concentrate permission risk.

ERC-4626 and vault math

For vaults, the key question is whether deposits and withdrawals are priced fairly. Inspect convertToShares, convertToAssets, totalAssets, deposit fees, withdrawal fees, rounding direction, and whether pending yield is counted honestly.

Bad vault math can dilute depositors, overstate share value, block withdrawals, or favor early users over later users. If the vault depends on external strategies, inspect those strategies too.

7. Layer 5: external calls, failure modes, reentrancy, oracles, and slippage

External calls are where contracts interact with other contracts. This is powerful, but it introduces failure modes. If a token or protocol calls an external router, vault, oracle, bridge, token, or strategy, the behavior of that external system can affect users.

Reentrancy and Checks-Effects-Interactions

Reentrancy can occur when a contract calls another contract before updating its own state. If the external contract calls back into the original contract during that window, accounting may be abused.

// Risky pattern: externalCall(); balances[msg.sender] -= amount; // Safer CEI pattern: balances[msg.sender] -= amount; externalCall();

Investors do not need to prove every reentrancy scenario. But you can look for obvious danger: external calls before balance updates, missing nonReentrant on withdrawal-like functions, and custom callback logic.

Oracle and price manipulation

If a protocol uses prices for collateral, shares, liquidations, minting, redemptions, or rewards, oracle design is critical. A single DEX spot price can be manipulated. Better systems use trusted feeds, TWAPs, staleness checks, deviation limits, and fallback rules.

Oracle review checklist

  • What price source is used?
  • Does it check stale prices?
  • Does it handle decimals correctly?
  • Does it use TWAP or aggregation?
  • Can admin change the oracle instantly?
  • What happens if oracle data is unavailable?
  • Does the protocol pause risky actions during oracle failure?

Slippage and router risk

Router calls should respect user slippage. If amountOutMin is hard-coded poorly or controlled by a contract that users cannot inspect, users may receive worse execution than expected. Fee-on-transfer tokens create additional problems because the amount received after fees may differ from the expected amount.

Delegatecall risk

delegatecall executes code from another contract in the context of the calling contract’s storage. It is powerful and dangerous. Unrestricted delegatecall to arbitrary targets or user-supplied data is a serious red flag.

8. Red-flag patterns and copy-paste indicators

The following patterns deserve immediate caution. One red flag does not always prove malice, but it should reduce position size and increase verification requirements.

Pattern What to search Why it matters Safer expectation
Upgradeable backdoor upgradeTo, upgradeToAndCall, proxy admin. Logic can change after users enter. Multisig plus timelock plus verified implementation.
Mint after launch mint, _mint, MINTER_ROLE. Supply can inflate and dump into buyers. Capped or disabled minting with transparent roles.
Honeypot transfer _transfer, blacklist, whitelist, pair checks. Users may buy but not sell. No sell-only revert, no hidden blacklist gates.
Tax rug setTax, setFees, sellTax. Sell tax can be raised to confiscatory levels. Low fixed tax or bounded changes with timelock.
Delegatecall abuse delegatecall. External code can modify local storage. Strict allowlists and audited targets only.
Oracle fragility latestRoundData, spot price reads, reserves. Bad prices can trigger bad liquidations or redemptions. Staleness checks, TWAP, aggregation, fallbacks.

9. Guided walkthroughs: ERC-20, proxy, vault, and AMM router

A. ERC-20 token with taxes

  1. Open the verified token contract on the explorer.
  2. Search _transfer.
  3. Check for tradingEnabled, isPair, sellTax, buyTax, blacklist checks, and max transaction logic.
  4. Search for tax setters and check who can call them.
  5. Check whether the maximum tax is capped.
  6. Search _mint and confirm whether new supply can be created.
  7. Check whether the owner can change router or pair addresses.
  8. Use Token Safety Checker as a quick scan, then verify important findings manually.

B. Upgradeable proxy

  1. Open the contract on the explorer.
  2. Look for a proxy label or “Read as Proxy.”
  3. Open the implementation address.
  4. Confirm implementation source code is verified.
  5. Find proxy admin or upgrader role.
  6. Check whether the admin is a Safe multisig, DAO, timelock, or single EOA.
  7. Review upgrade events and dates.
  8. Compare docs against actual upgrade control.

C. ERC-4626 vault

  1. Find deposit, withdraw, redeem, and mint.
  2. Inspect convertToShares and convertToAssets.
  3. Check totalAssets and what it includes.
  4. Review rounding direction and fees.
  5. Check whether withdrawals can be paused.
  6. Review strategy contracts and external dependencies.
  7. Simulate deposit and withdrawal behavior where possible.

D. AMM router interaction

  1. Search for swap functions such as swapExactTokensForTokens or swapExactETHForTokens.
  2. Check whether amountOutMin is user-controlled.
  3. Check whether the route can be changed by admin.
  4. Check support for fee-on-transfer tokens if the token has taxes.
  5. Check whether slippage settings are clearly surfaced to users.
  6. Simulate the route if meaningful funds are involved.

10. Tools for reading smart contract code faster

Tools help you move faster, but they should not replace judgment. Treat tools as a first-pass filter, not a final verdict.

Tool Use case Link
TokenToolHub Token Safety Checker Quick scan for token control risks, owner powers, blacklist logic, proxy risk, taxes, and sell restrictions. Open tool
Etherscan, Basescan, BscScan, Polygonscan Source code, holders, events, proxy admin, constructor args. Etherscan
Sourcify Source-to-bytecode verification and full match checks. Sourcify
Slither Static analysis for common Solidity issues. Slither
Mythril Symbolic analysis for deeper vulnerability testing. Mythril
Tenderly Transaction simulation, debugging, trace inspection. Tenderly
Phalcon Transaction simulation and visual trace analysis. Phalcon
Foundry Local tests and quick contract experiments. Foundry Book

Minimal Foundry sanity test

If you are comfortable with development tools, you can import verified source code into a local test and create simple sanity checks around transfer behavior.

// Minimal investor sanity test idea: // Goal: confirm transfer does not behave like a full confiscation. pragma solidity ^0.8.24; import "forge-std/Test.sol"; import "../src/Token.sol"; contract TokenSanityTest is Test { Token token; address alice = address(0xA11CE); address bob = address(0xB0B); function setUp() public { token = new Token(); token.transfer(alice, 1000 ether); } function testTransferDoesNotConfiscateEverything() public { vm.prank(alice); token.transfer(bob, 100 ether); assertGt(token.balanceOf(bob), 0, "recipient received nothing"); } }

11. Printable checklist and risk scorecard

Use this checklist before making a token or protocol decision. A single severe failure should override a high narrative score.

One-page smart contract review checklist

  • Verification: source code is verified and matches deployed bytecode.
  • Correct address: contract address is confirmed through official sources.
  • Proxy: proxy status is known and implementation is verified.
  • Upgrade control: proxy admin or upgrader is multisig plus timelock, not a single EOA.
  • Roles: owner, admin, minter, pauser, and upgrader roles are identified.
  • Minting: no unrestricted post-launch minting.
  • Taxes: taxes are fixed or tightly bounded, not mutable to extreme values.
  • Transfer logic: no hidden sell-only reverts, blacklist traps, or whitelist gates.
  • Vault logic: share conversion and totalAssets logic are understandable.
  • Oracles: price feeds include staleness, decimals, and manipulation checks.
  • External calls: withdrawal-like functions follow safe state update patterns.
  • Docs and audit: audit scope matches deployed contracts and is verified on official sources.
Dimension Questions Score
Verification Source and bytecode verified? Correct address confirmed? Constructor or initializer readable? 0 to 5
Upgrade safety Proxy admin safe? Multisig and timelock? Implementation verified? 0 to 5
Permissions No EOA superpowers? Roles scoped? Admin powers documented? 0 to 5
Token safety No hidden mint, sell block, blacklist trap, mutable confiscatory tax, or fake burn? 0 to 5
External risk Reentrancy guarded? Oracle robust? Slippage respected? Delegatecall controlled? 0 to 5
Score guide Use scores to fight narrative pressure

A score of 20 to 25 can justify deeper research, not blind confidence. A score of 16 to 19 means small pilot only. A score of 15 or below means the contract risk is too unclear or too concentrated for serious exposure.

12. Quick check

Use these questions to make sure you understand the core review process.

Question Direct answer
What should you verify first? The exact deployed contract address and whether source code matches deployed bytecode.
Why can renounced ownership be misleading? A proxy admin, role admin, or external controller may still retain upgrade or control power.
Which ERC-20 function often hides token traps? _transfer, because taxes, blacklist gates, sell restrictions, and max wallet rules often live there.
What is a major proxy red flag? Upgradeable implementation controlled by a single EOA with no timelock.
What should you check in vault contracts? totalAssets, share conversion math, deposit and withdrawal flow, fees, rounding, and pause controls.
Where can you start if you are not technical? Use Token Safety Checker for first-pass token risks, then verify owner, proxy, mint, tax, and blacklist findings on a block explorer.

13. External resources and official docs

Verdict: read the control surface before you trust the narrative

Smart contract code does not care about marketing. It does not care about influencer confidence, roadmap graphics, or Telegram energy. It defines what can actually happen. It defines who can mint, upgrade, pause, blacklist, tax, withdraw, rescue, route, or change critical assumptions.

You do not need to become an elite auditor to avoid many bad trades. You need a process. Verify the address and source. Map the architecture. Inspect roles. Read transfer and mint logic. Check proxy controls. Review vault math and oracle assumptions. Simulate risky actions where possible. Compare documentation with deployed reality.

If the contract is unverifiable, the proxy admin is a single EOA, owner powers are broad, taxes can become confiscatory, minting is unrestricted, or withdrawals depend on hidden control, the safest decision is usually to skip or size down aggressively.

The code defines the rules. Read the rules before you invest.

Start with a token safety scan, then verify on-chain

Use TokenToolHub Token Safety Checker to identify owner powers, mint authority, blacklist logic, proxy risk, pause controls, sell restrictions, and tax risks before you manually inspect the contract.

FAQs

Do I need to be a Solidity auditor to read smart contract code?

No. Investors can learn to identify major risk signals without performing a full audit. Start with source verification, proxy status, owner roles, mint functions, transfer logic, blacklist controls, tax setters, and upgrade permissions.

What is the first thing to check before reading a contract?

Verify that you have the correct deployed address and that the source code is verified on a trusted explorer or through Sourcify. Reading the wrong contract is a common research mistake.

Does verified source code mean a contract is safe?

No. Verified source code only means the code is visible. The visible code may still contain mint authority, blacklist logic, upgrade risk, unsafe external calls, or dangerous tax controls.

Why are upgradeable proxies risky?

Upgradeable proxies allow implementation logic to change after deployment. This can be useful for bug fixes, but it creates risk if upgrades are controlled by a single EOA or lack timelock review.

What functions should I search first in an ERC-20 token?

Search _transfer, _mint, onlyOwner, setTax, setFee, blacklist, whitelist, pause, setTrading, and upgradeTo.

Can renounced ownership still be risky?

Yes. Renounced ownership can be misleading if the contract is upgradeable through a proxy admin or if roles, external controllers, or fee managers still retain control.

How can Token Safety Checker help?

Token Safety Checker can help identify common token control risks such as ownership, mint authority, blacklist logic, pause controls, hidden taxes, sell restrictions, and proxy upgradeability. It should be used as a first-pass scan, not a replacement for manual verification.

What is the safest decision if contract control is unclear?

If you cannot verify source code, proxy admin, role holders, mint authority, tax controls, or withdrawal behavior, reduce exposure or walk away. Unclear control is itself a risk.


Final reminder: reading code is a process, not a vibe. Verify source, map architecture, inspect roles, check token logic, review external risks, and use tools only as inputs. The contract tells you what the token can do after you buy. Check first, then decide.

About the author: Wisdom Uche Ijika Verified icon 1
Founder @TokenToolHub | Web3 Technical Researcher, Token Security & On-Chain Intelligence | Helping traders and investors identify smart contract risks before interacting with tokens
Reader Supported Research

Support Independent Web3 Research

TokenToolHub publishes free Web3 security guides, smart contract risk explainers, and on-chain research resources for traders, builders, and investors. If this article helped you, you can optionally support the platform and help keep these resources free.

Network USDC on Base
Optional
0xBFCD4b0F3c307D235E540A9116A9f38cE65E666A

Support is completely optional. Please only send USDC on the Base network to this address. TokenToolHub will continue publishing free educational resources for the Web3 community.